-(4)-1731951738-q80.webp){kind=small}
The Biden administration has announced a significant extension of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for immigrants from El Salvador, Sudan, Ukraine, and Venezuela. This decision will allow nearly one million individuals to continue living and working legally in the United States, benefiting from deportation protections provided under the TPS program.
This move extends critical protections to people from countries experiencing war, natural disasters, or other emergencies that make deportations unsafe.
According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the extension affects approximately 234,000 Salvadorans, 1,900 Sudanese, 104,000 Ukrainians, and 600,000 Venezuelans.
The TPS program for El Salvador has been extended through March 2026, while the designations for Sudan, Ukraine, and Venezuela will last until October 2026. These extensions provide temporary reprieve to immigrants whose lives might otherwise be at risk if they were forced to return to their home countries.
This decision comes at a politically sensitive time, as President-elect Donald Trump has signaled his intent to overhaul immigration policies, including the TPS program. During his previous administration, Trump sought to end TPS protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, citing the program’s "temporary" nature. However, his efforts were largely blocked by legal challenges.
Both Trump and incoming Vice President JD Vance have expressed opposition to TPS, arguing that it has been improperly extended over the years.
While the Biden administration has extended the current protections, it stopped short of redesignating TPS to include new arrivals. This decision disappointed progressive activists who had called for expanded eligibility. For instance, redesignating TPS for Venezuela could have made an additional 450,000 migrants eligible for protections, but the administration refrained from doing so.
Internal deliberations suggest that officials were concerned such a move might be perceived as an attempt to complicate Trump’s incoming administration’s plans.
The decision also highlights the varied circumstances of the affected immigrants. Salvadorans with TPS have generally lived in the U.S. for over two decades, since the status was first granted in 2001 after devastating earthquakes in El Salvador. Many have since established deep roots in the country, raising families and contributing to their communities.
Venezuelan TPS holders represent a different demographic, as most have arrived in the U.S. in the past four years, fleeing a severe economic and political crisis in their home country.
Many of these immigrants entered the U.S. under programs implemented by the Biden administration to address illegal immigration or crossed the border illegally. Their inclusion in TPS reflects the broader humanitarian crisis that has seen over 8 million Venezuelans leave their homeland in search of safety and stability.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian TPS beneficiaries largely arrived after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. Many were processed at the U.S.-Mexico border or entered the country through private sponsorship initiatives under the Biden administration, which facilitated refugee resettlement.
These programs have allowed displaced Ukrainians to find safety while awaiting a resolution to the ongoing conflict in their homeland.
Despite extending protections for these groups, the administration has faced criticism for not including other immigrant populations, such as Nicaraguans, under the TPS umbrella. Advocates have urged the administration to act before Trump’s inauguration, but DHS officials appear hesitant to take further steps, partly due to concerns about the optics of the decision.
This move underscores the Biden administration’s commitment to maintaining certain immigration protections in the face of potential policy reversals by the incoming administration.
By extending TPS for these groups, the administration has provided temporary security to hundreds of thousands of individuals while highlighting the complex and politically charged nature of U.S. immigration policy.
However, the refusal to expand TPS eligibility for new arrivals indicates the administration’s careful balancing act in navigating political, humanitarian, and legal considerations during a contentious transition of power.
