-(4)-1731951738-q80.webp){kind=small}
Tech billionaire Elon Musk has launched a scathing attack on the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), labeling it a “criminal organization” and stating that it should be dismantled.
Musk made the remarks in a post on X, the social media platform he owns, after reports surfaced that USAID officials attempted to block access to his new advisory board, the “Department of Government Efficiency.”
“USAID is a criminal organization. Time for it to die,” Musk wrote in response to an NBC News report detailing how senior officials at the agency physically obstructed individuals associated with his advisory board from accessing secure systems.
The incident has reignited debates over the agency’s role and effectiveness, particularly as former President Donald Trump has proposed significant structural changes to the federal government, including USAID.
In a three-page letter released last week, it was revealed that Trump is considering merging USAID into a branch under the State Department as part of broader efforts to reshape federal agencies.
This move aligns with his administration’s long-standing skepticism of foreign aid programs and the organizations responsible for distributing billions of dollars in assistance worldwide.
The controversy surrounding USAID has intensified amid reports that several federal agency websites, including USAID’s, have gone offline in recent days. The reasons for these disruptions remain unclear, but they have fueled speculation about ongoing internal conflicts within the government regarding transparency and oversight.
USAID, which was established in 1961, is responsible for providing humanitarian assistance to countries affected by conflicts, natural disasters, and economic challenges.
The agency also supports development programs aimed at strengthening governance, health, and education systems in partner nations. However, its $50 billion annual budget has made it a frequent target of criticism, with detractors arguing that it lacks accountability and often funds ineffective or politically motivated projects.
Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order that placed a temporary freeze on federal aid spending, citing concerns over waste and mismanagement. The decision faced immediate legal challenges, with a judge temporarily blocking the administration’s efforts to suspend funding.
Despite these setbacks, Trump’s broader push for federal restructuring remains a key element of his policy agenda.
Musk’s comments add a new dimension to the debate, as his influence in both the technology and political spheres continues to grow.
His criticism of USAID reflects a broader distrust of federal agencies among certain conservative and libertarian circles, who argue that international aid programs should be reduced or eliminated in favor of a more isolationist approach.
In response to Musk’s remarks, USAID has not issued an official statement. However, supporters of the agency have defended its work, emphasizing its role in disaster relief, public health initiatives, and economic development programs that benefit millions worldwide.
They argue that dismantling or defunding the agency would have dire consequences for global stability and America’s diplomatic influence.
Critics of Musk’s stance have also pointed out that while his companies, such as SpaceX and Tesla, have received substantial government support through contracts and subsidies, he has been increasingly vocal in his opposition to certain federal institutions.
His push to establish the “Department of Government Efficiency” suggests an ambition to influence policymaking beyond the private sector.
The clash between Musk and USAID highlights the broader ideological divide over the role of government in international affairs. While some see foreign aid as a necessary tool for promoting stability and U.S. interests abroad, others argue that the funds could be better spent on domestic priorities.
As debates over the future of USAID continue, the agency faces mounting pressure to justify its expenditures and effectiveness.
With Trump reportedly considering major reforms, the next administration may play a decisive role in determining whether USAID remains an independent entity or is absorbed into the State Department.
Musk’s remarks, while controversial, have amplified discussions about government efficiency, oversight, and the allocation of taxpayer funds. Whether his call for USAID’s dissolution gains traction remains to be seen, but his influence ensures that the debate will continue to draw attention from policymakers and the public alike.
